4/1/2023 0 Comments Macbook pro geekbench![]() ![]() The second difference is that the Pro tops out with up to 32GB of unified memory and supports up to 200GB per second of memory bandwidth, while the Max tops out with 64GB of unified memory and up to 400GB per second of memory bandwidth. First, the M1 Pro comes with a 16-core integrated GPU, while the more powerful Max is equipped with a 32-core integrated GPU. ![]() While the M1 Pro and M1 Max share the same number of processing cores, there are notable differences between the two. The 13-inch MacBook Pro with Apple’s M1 processor will continue to be sold alongside the new MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch models. Apple fans can configure both new MacBook Pro models with either the M1 Max or M1 Pro. ![]() ![]() Rumors of a redesigned Mac Pro with an ARM-based M-series processor have been circulating for some time, but Apple has not made announcements on that front.Īpple’s M1 Max processor was announced alongside the M1 Pro. This means that the 16-core and 24-core Intel-powered Mac Pro still outperforms Apple’s ARM-based processor design, at least for the time being. The performance here is noteworthy, as the M1 Max isn’t just the most powerful silicon that Apple has ever made, but it also outperforms every Intel-powered Mac except high-performance Mac desktops equipped with Intel’s Xeon processors, according to MacRumors. Once the new MacBook Pro models start shipping, we’ll be seeing more benchmark results surface that will hopefully confirm Apple’s estimates. The early benchmark numbers appear to fall in line with what Apple is quoting for its new silicon. “The CPU in M1 Pro and M1 Max delivers up to 70% faster CPU performance than M1,” Apple had said in a press release. While the single-core results are slightly better on this year’s M1 Max and Pro processors, the real jump is in multi-core performance, which sees an improvement of 56% gen-on-gen. The multi-core performance of the M1 Max on the benchmarking utility is double the score earned by the M1-powered MacBook Pro 13-inch.įor reference, the M1-powered 13-inch model from last year earned a single-core score of 1,705 points and a multi-core score of 7,382 points on Geekbench’s utility. The Geekbench benchmark showed that Apple’s M1 Max processor with 10 CPU cores notched 1,749 points on a single-core test and 11,542 points on the multi-core test. It will be found inside the newly redesigned MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch. Fitbit Versa 3Īn early benchmark for Apple’s new in-house M1 Max processor has surfaced online, revealing that the CPU delivers a nearly 60% performance gain compared to the M1 silicon that debuted a year ago. Those who want that level of graphics performance or higher will be better off selecting an M1 Max MacBook Pro. However, it is way behind the nearest Ampere SKU, the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, which is in the OpenCL chart with 45,898. The M1 OpenCL scores position the Apple Silicon neatly between the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (36,196) and the GeForce GTX 1650 (38,361). The average Metal score for the M1 Pro with 16-core GPU over three separate records is 41,371 while a single entry reveals an OpenCL mark of 36,664 points (over 38,000 points has been reported though). Yet again, the M1 Pro destroys anything by the M1, which is hardly a surprise considering the differences in GPU configuration. The Apple SoC and its 10-core CPU has a +40.68% (single) and a +34.30% (multi) advantage over the 10-core Comet Lake desktop chip while not being nearly as power hungry.Īs for graphics, the M1 Pro has been tested in both OpenCL and Metal. 14 nm for the Intel processor) even allows the M1 Pro to demolish the Intel Core i9-10910 that can be found in the 2020 27-inch iMac. A more-refined manufacturing process (5 nm vs. This would leave the new Apple Silicon at the top of the Geekbench Mac single-core chart while destroying anything with an M1 in it in the multi-core chart. The M1 Pro tests show a score pattern of around 1,750 points for Geekbench 5 single-core and about 12,100 points for multi-core (current averages would have been artificially lowered by a seemingly outlier of a record). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |